Letermovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus reactivation in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: Single center Canadian data.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is associated with morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Letermovir is a novel antiviral agent that prevents CMV reactivation in alloHCT patients, with limited data regarding influence on post-alloHCT outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 273 alloHCT recipients, 158 in the non-letermovir cohort (NLC), and 115 in the cohort using letermovir prophylaxis (LC). Patients that received letermovir were CMV-seropositive and met criteria for high risk of CMV reactivation. RESULTS: Median start of letermovir was 21 days post-alloHCT, median duration of prophylaxis was 86 days. Letermovir prophylaxis demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in first CMV reactivation (at 200 days post 63.9% in the NLC vs. 35.7% in the LC; p < .001). On univariate analysis at 1 year, overall survival (OS) for NLC was 79.6% and 79.5% for LC (p = .54). Non relapse mortality (NRM) at 1 year for NLC was 12% and 12.3% for LC (p = .69). Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) at 1 year was 13.9% for NLC versus 17.1 for the LC (p = .27). On multivariable analysis, there was no significant difference between the two cohorts for OS, NRM, and CIR. CONCLUSIONS: Letermovir prophylaxis started at day +21 post-alloHCT reduced CMV reactivation, with no impact on posttransplant outcomes.

Machine learning for the prediction of survival post-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: A single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Prediction of outcomes following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains a major challenge. Machine learning (ML) is a computational procedure that may facilitate the generation of HCT prediction models. We sought to investigate the prognostic potential of multiple ML algorithms when applied to a large single-center allogeneic HCT database. METHODS: Our registry included 2697 patients that underwent allogeneic HCT from January 1976 to December 2017, 45 pre-transplant baseline variables were included in the predictive assessment of each ML algorithm on overall survival (OS) as determined by area under the curve (AUC). Pre-transplant variables used in the EBMT machine learning study (Shouval et al, 2015) were used as a benchmark for comparison. RESULTS: On the entire dataset, the random forest (RF) algorithm performed best (AUC 0.71±0.04) compared to the second-best model, logistic regression (LR) (AUC=0.69±0.04) (p<0.001). Both algorithms demonstrated improved AUC scores using all 45 variables compared to the limited variables examined by the EBMT study. Survival at 100 days post-HCT using RF on the full dataset discriminated patients into different prognostic groups with different 2-year OS (p<0.0001). We then examined the ML methods that allow for significant individual variable identification, including LR and RF, and identified matched related donors (HR=0.49, p<0.0001), increasing TBI dose (HR=1.60, p=0.006), increasing recipient age (HR=1.92, p<0.0001), higher baseline Hb (HR=0.59, p=0.0002) and increased baseline FEV1 (HR=0.73, p=0.02), among others. CONCLUSION: The application of multiple ML techniques on single center allogeneic HCT databases warrants further investigation and may provide a useful tool to identify variables with prognostic potential.

Prognostic implication of pre-transplant FEV1 on long-term outcomes following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Pre-transplant pulmonary function testing (PFT) is essential before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT), yet the optimal cutoff value for affecting transplant outcomes remains poorly defined. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of pre-HCT PFT data from 605 consecutive patients at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2013 used binary recursive partitioning to identify cutoff values for overall survival (OS) as an endpoint of transplant outcomes. These values were compared to HCT comorbidity index (HCT-CI) FEV1 cutoffs for OS, cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality. RESULTS: FEV1 ≥ 81% was the identified cutoff point. The OS rate at 3 years showed 49.8% (FEV1 ≥ 81%) vs. 36.6% (<81%, p < .001). For HCT-CI cutoffs, the OS rate at 3 years for FEV1 ≥ 80%, 66%-80% and ≤65% were 49.0%, 38.1% and 37.6% (p = .011), respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed that FEV1 ≥ 81% predicted reduced mortality (HR 0.682, p = .001). Subgroup analysis showed both FEV1 ≥ 81% and FEV1 by HCT-CI cutoffs may stratify patients according to OS and NRM risk in subgroups receiving myeloablative, but not reduced intensity conditioning. CONCLUSION: FEV1 ≥ 81% can predict OS and NRM in our cohort and is potentially simpler when risk stratifying patients undergoing allogeneic HCT, particularly those receiving myeloablative conditioning.

Influence of conditioning regimen intensity on outcomes post-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in complete morphological remission.

INTRODUCTION: The literature comparing outcomes between myeloablative (MAC) and reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is conflicting. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 451 patients who underwent allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) for AML in complete remission (CR) with either RIC (n = 331) or MAC (n = 120) with the use of dual T-cell depletion as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. RESULTS: Univariate analysis demonstrated nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 2 years was 19.1% for MAC and 22.5% for RIC (p = .44). Two-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 19.8% for MAC and 24.5% for RIC (p = .15). Two-year overall survival (OS) was 61% and 53% for MAC and RIC, respectively (p = .02). Two-year graft-versus-host disease relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 40.8% for MAC and 33.7% for RIC (p = .30). A propensity score-matched analysis was done matching patients for age, HLA match, in vivo T-cell depletion, and Disease Risk Index (DRI). Two-year OS was 67% for MAC, 66% for RIC (p = .95). A subgroup analysis identified that matched related donor transplants benefit from MAC with OS at 2 years 82.6% versus 57.3% for RIC (p = .006). CONCLUSIONS: In the matched-related donor setting, MAC regimens may offer superior survival. Overall, for our cohort of predominantly in vivo T-cell depleted patients the outcomes of MAC and RIC were similar.

Mutational profile, outcomes, and impact of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia and inconclusive cytogenetic analysis.

BACKGROUND: Inconclusive cytogenetic analysis (IC) at baseline has been reported as a predictor of poor prognosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The mutational profile in this group of patients, and its impact on outcomes have not been reported. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed adult patients (≥18 years) with newly diagnosed AML treated with intensive induction chemotherapy between 2015 and 2019. Patients with any documented cytogenetic abnormalities were excluded. Targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) was performed in all patients. Baseline characteristics, mutation profile, and outcomes were compared between patients with normal cytogenetics(NC) and those with IC. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (males 39.3%; median age 59 years) had IC at diagnosis. The proportion of patients with mutations in genes with proven prognostic impact were not different between AML patients with IC and NC. AML patients with NC were more likely to harbor the prognostically favorable NPM1mut /FLT3-ITDwt mutational combination conferring "favorable" risk status. As a result, a larger proportion of patients in the IC group underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo HCT; 54.1% vs. 39.6%; p = .02). The 2-year RFS (55.9% vs. 58.5%; p = .29) and OS (61.9% vs. 66.9%; p = .48) were similar in IC and NC patients. There was no difference in survival of patients who underwent allo HCT when compared with patients who did not (p = .99). CONCLUSIONS: Inconclusive cytogenetic analysis may not be an independent prognostic indicator in AML. In such patients, molecular abnormalities detected through NGS or whole genome sequencing are more likely to be informative.

Outcomes of Patients Diagnosed With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Results From a Tertiary Care Center.

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is currently the only curative treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). METHODS: We analyzed the outcomes of 93 patients (median age: 52 years) who underwent allo-HCT at our center between 1989 and 2019. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 35 months, relapse was observed in 15.1% (n = 14) patients. The estimated 2-year non-relapse mortality, relapse-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were 38.1%, 54.2%, and 58.7%, respectively. The ECOG performance status ≥ 2 (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.1; p = .001) and use of total body irradiation (in a myeloablative conditioning regimen; HR: 2.64; p = .005) were predictive of poor OS after multivariable analysis. The occurrence of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease post-transplant was associated with poor survival (p = .001). CONCLUSION: Although the use of kinase and bcl2 inhibitors may result in a decrease in the number and need of transplants, allo-HCT remains a viable option in selected patients with high-risk CLL and good performance status.

Comparison of Outcomes After Second Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Versus Donor Lymphocyte Infusion in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Patients.

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is potentially curative for hematological disease however can be complicated by relapse or graft failure (GF), for which second-HCT and donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) are performed. This study aimed to compare outcomes following the two interventions. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 89 patients with relapse or GF after first-HCT, 50 (56%) underwent second HCT and 39 (44%) received (DLI), from June 2011 to September 2020. RESULTS: Median age at intervention was 55 years (19-72). Second-HCT was performed for relapse in 19 patients and for GF in 31 patients (primary GF in 11 and secondary in 20 patients), same donor was used in 25 (50%) patients. DLI was performed for relapse in 20 and for secondary GF in 19 patients. Median number of DLI administered was 2 (range 1-11). Univariate analysis demonstrated 2 year overall survival (OS) for second-HCT was superior when performed for relapse (65%) compared to GF (44%) (P = .03). For DLI patients, 2 year OS was 49% for GF and 45% for relapse patients (P = .49). For relapse as an indication, second-HCT demonstrated borderline superiority compared to DLI (P = .07). Multivariable analysis demonstrated for OS for the entire cohort demonstrated donor mismatch (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.26%-0.94%, P = .03), KPS at time of intervention (HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.14%-3.85%, P = .02) and time from first-HCT to intervention (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28%-0.93%, P = .03) as significant variables. CONCLUSION: Second-HCT may improve outcomes when performed for relapse post-transplant if patients achieve remission again, while DLI may be reserved for patients with active disease.

Fresh vs. frozen allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell grafts: A successful timely option.

Cryopreservation of grafts has been established in autologous and cord blood transplantation, yet there is little experience regarding the effect of cryopreservation with sibling and unrelated grafts. We evaluated the effect of cryopreservation of grafts on allogeneic transplant outcomes using related, unrelated and haploidentical donors, including 958 patients, age 18-74 years (median 55) and using PBSC for various hematologic malignancies. Fresh grafts were received by 648 (68%) patients, 310 (32%) received cryopreserved. There was no difference between fresh vs cryopreserved grafts for neutrophil engraftment (P = .09), platelet engraftment (P = .11), graft failure (5.6% vs 6.8%, P = .46) and grade II-IV acute graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) (P = .71), moderate/severe chronic GVHD was observed in 176 (27%) vs 123 (40%) patients, respectively (P < .001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated no difference between fresh vs cryopreserved for OS (P = .39) and CIR (P = .08) while fresh grafts demonstrated borderline increased NRM (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.02-1.59, P = .04). Of note, for patients with no or mild chronic GVHD, CIR was less for fresh compared to cryopreserved (HR = 0.67 for fresh, 95% CI 0.48-0.92, P = .01). We conclude there were no differences in engraftment and survival between fresh and cryopreserved grafts for allogeneic HCT, thus establishing cryopreservation to be a safe option for allogeneic HCT.

Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide Combined with Anti-Thymocyte Globulin as Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is curative for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) but with significant non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse. We compared the combination of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG; 4.5 mg/kg) and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy; 50 mg/kg on day +3 and +4) with other graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis regimens used for these patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 159 patients, aged 22-73 (median 56) years, having undergone transplantation for high-risk AML (n = 120) or MDS (n = 39). The donors were matched related (33%), unrelated (55%) and haploidentical (12%). Almost all patients used peripheral blood stem cells. Conditioning was myeloablative (34%) or reduced intensity (66%). ATG + PTCy was used in 69 patients (43%), and other GvHD prophylaxis regimens in 90 patients (57%). RESULTS: Grade III-IV acute GvHD occurred in 4% of the ATG + PTCy patients versus 20% of those using other regimens (p = 0.004), and chronic GvHD in 19% of the ATG + PTCy patients versus 41% of those using other regimens (p = 0.003). Two-year GvHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 30% with ATG + PTCy versus 18% with other regimens (p = 0.04). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that while ATG + PTCy had no significant influence on overall survival, cumulative incidence of relapse or NRM, there was a significant influence on GRFS in favor of ATG + PTCy (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.45-0.99, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the ATG + PTCy combination significantly improved GRFS in allogeneic HCT for high-risk AML and MDS without influencing other outcomes.

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide combined with anti-thymocyte globulin for graft-vs-host disease prophylaxis improves survival and lowers non-relapse mortality in older patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) represents a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants (HCT). Several strategies exist for GVHD prophylaxis and include post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG). While several groups have described the use of PTCY in younger patients, there is a paucity of data about the efficacy of PTCY in older individuals, particularly when combined with ATG. We investigated the effect of PTCY and ATG combination on transplant outcomes in older patients at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada. Compared to those patients who received other forms of GVHD prophylaxis, individuals who received ATG-PTCY combination had higher 2-year overall survival (OS), 57% (95% confidence interval, 44-69) vs 37% (26-49), P = 0.02; higher 2-year graft-vs-host- and relapse-free survival (GRFS), 27% (17-39) vs 12% (6-21), P = 0.01; lower 2-year non-relapse mortality (NRM), 21% (12-32) vs 45% (33-56), P = 1.00 × 10-3; lower 100-day incidence of grade 2-4 acute GVHD (aGVHD), 11% (5-21) vs 28% (18-39), P = 0.02; and lower 100-day incidence of grade 3-4 aGVHD, 0% vs 7% (3-15), P = 0.02 without an increase in the 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), 31% (20-43) vs 21% (12-32), P = 0.14. Therefore, in older HCT recipients, use of PTCY combined with ATG is associated with improved OS, lower NRM, decreased risk of aGVHD, and improved GRFS without a significant increase in relapse risk. Therefore, the PTCY with ATG combination represents an effective strategy for GVHD prophylaxis in older allogeneic HCT recipients.

Risk of Thrombosis in Adult Philadelphia-Positive ALL Treated with an Asparaginase-Free ALL Regimen.

BACKGROUND: venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), especially in patients treated with asparaginase (ASNase)-including regiments. However, VTE risk in adult Philadelphia-positive ALL (Ph+ve ALL) patients treated with non-hyperCVAD chemotherapy is unclear. In this study, we examined VTE incidence in adult Ph+ve ALL patients treated with imatinib plus a pediatric-inspired asparaginase (ASNase)-free regimen modified from the Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) ALL protocol. METHODS: a single centre retrospective review of Ph+ve ALL patients treated at Princess Margaret Cancer Center (PMCC) from 2008-2019 with imatinib plus modified DFCI protocol was conducted. RESULTS: of the 123 patients included, 30 (24.3%) had at least 1 radiology confirmed VTE event from diagnosis to the end of maintenance therapy. 86.7% (26/30) of the VTE events occurred during active treatment. Of all VTE events, the majority (53.3%) were DVT and/or PE while another significant portion were catheter-related (40.0%). Major bleeding was observed in 1 patient on VTE treatment with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). CONCLUSION: a high VTE incidence (24.3%) was observed in adults Ph+ve ALL patients treated with imatinib plus an ASNase-free modified DFCI pediatric ALL protocol, suggesting prophylactic anticoagulation should be considered for all adult Ph+ve ALL patients including those treated with ASNase-free regimens.

Cellular immunotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia: How specific should it be?

Significant improvements in the survival of patients with hematological cancers following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation provide evidence supporting the potency of immune cell-mediated anti-leukemic effects. Studies focusing on immune cell-based cancer therapies have made significant breakthroughs in the last few years. Adoptive cellular therapy (ACT), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, in particular, has significantly increased the survival of patients with B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and aggressive B cell lymphoma. Despite antigen-negative relapses and severe toxicities such as cytokine release syndrome after treatment, CAR-T cell therapies have been approved by the FDA in some conditions. Although a number of studies have tried to achieve similar results for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), clinical outcomes have not been as promising. In this review, we summarize recent and ongoing studies on cellular therapies for AML patients, with a focus on antigen-specific versus -nonspecific approaches.

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Single Centre Experience from North India.

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered as standard of care in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) patients aged 65 years or younger. We analyzed data of 94 patients of plasma cell dyscrasias who underwent 95 autologous transplants at our institute from October 2003 to Aug 2016. Other than 76 patients of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, we also transplanted two patients of POEMS syndrome, two patients of plasma cell leukemia, three patients of concurrent light chain deposition disease, three patients of multifocal plasmacytomas, and eight patients of isolated light chain myeloma. One patient underwent transplant twice. The median age of patients was 53 years (range 21-65). The average interval between diagnosis and transplant was 10.51 ± 5.42 months. The predominant stage in the study cohort was ISS-III. IgG kappa was the commonest subtype of plasma cell dyscrasia (27.9%) followed by IgG lambda (16.27%). Renal involvement was seen in 25% patients at the time of transplantation. Following chemotherapy, 42% patients were in CR, 39% in VGPR, 5% had PR and 14% had progressive disease at the time of transplantation. All patients were conditioned with melphalan (dose 120-200 mg/m2) except for one who received an additional bortezomib for his second transplant. The mean time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 11.09 ± 1.82 and 12.69 ± 4.55 days respectively. Mucositis was noted in all patients (grade 3 in 37.5% patients). The median PFS (biochemical) was 55.8% and PFS (clinical) was 76.7% at 6.5 years. Thirteen percent of the transplanted patients succumbed to their illness of which three patients died within 30 days of transplant. Median OS was 76.7% at 6.5 years. ASCT is a feasible option for MM in India and the results are comparable.